🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."