🔗 Share this article

At present, one popular entertainment pick is a show set in the past illustrating Manhattan's elite during a prosperous era. An interesting thread casually mentions industrial employees protesting for the concept of “888”: eight-hour periods dedicated to work, sleep, and personal time.

This idea was far from revolutionary in the 1880s. The motto, linked to visionary thinker Robert Owen, dates back to 1817. Even earlier, a 16th-century Spanish ordinance capped laborers in the colonies to reasonable hours.

How would reformers like a ruler from the past think of “996”? This term describes being on the job from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week – amounting to 72 hours of grind. Starting in the Chinese tech industry, 996 was once described as a “blessing” by an influential entrepreneur. But, laborers objected, voicing opposition digitally and prevailing in legal battles against employers.

Today, 996 has returned – and it probably persisted all along. Sources show that employees across industries are required to put in long shifts. Among startups, embracing such hours is considered essential for success. Recruitment posts sometimes state absurdly long hours and suggest that applicants should be excited by the idea. Some recruiters are told that a readiness to work 72-hour weeks is non-negotiable.

A media outlet proclaimed that overwork ethos is making a comeback and tougher now. A founder described the philosophy as: “No drinking, no drugs, 996, lift heavy, run far, marry early, track sleep, eat steak and eggs.” Another wrote online about regularly putting in time during days off and producing top results after dark.

A lot of individuals find it confusing about this shift. Weren't we all fallen out of love with overwork? Recent successes from four-day week initiatives prove that the vast majority of participating companies opted to keep the revised hours. Looking abroad, more enlightened approaches to work that harmonize various life aspects may not come at a productivity cost and can create improved well-being.

For instance of the Netherlands, which has a typical working week is about 32 hours. Although they work less, this state has been surpassing its peers and stands high in the latest international satisfaction survey.

Moreover, there is talk of growing work-agnosticism, notably in youth. Surveys organized by leading companies revealed that life outside work was listed as the most important factor in choosing an employer. Historically, this aspect surpassed pay as a motivator.

So what are we seeing renewed, harsh embrace of grueling schedules? Two theories might explain this trend. First, it may signal the last gasp of a declining mindset – one last push before it disappears. Alternatively suggests current findings showing that excessive work results in mental alterations. Studies find that overworked individuals show alterations in brain regions linked to decision-making and mood management. Looking at certain well-known tech leaders, that idea fits well. Maybe people with such brain changes could consider that such a schedule are good or effective.

Because industry insiders often love new ideas, maybe their influenced minds could be convinced that inhumane working practices are old hat through audacious alternatives. Which ideas might catch on? Some dream of shorter workweeks, not far from a thinker's once-predicted 15-hour workweek. Others propose a specific ratio of work to rest, or allocating limited office hours and additional days for oneself. It could be branded cleverly and claims that it improves health, any of these could become the new phenomenon in intense industries.