🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, intimidating messages recurred. Initially, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, later from the authorities. Ultimately, one resident states he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and warned explicitly: keep quiet or encounter real trouble.

The leather artisan is part of a group opposing a expensive initiative where one of India's largest slums – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – faces bulldozed and redeveloped by a large business group.

"The culture of Dharavi is like nowhere else in the planet," says the resident. "Yet their intention is to destroy our social fabric and silence our voices."

Opposing Environments

The cramped lanes of this community sit in stark contrast to the soaring skyscrapers and elite residences that loom over the area. Homes are constructed informally and typically without proper sanitation, small-scale operations emit toxic smoke and the environment is saturated with the suffocating smell of open sewers.

To some, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a developed area of premium apartments, neat parks, shiny shopping centers and residences with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream realized.

"We lack sufficient health services, proper streets or sewage systems and there are no spaces for kids to enjoy," states a tea vendor, fifty-six, who migrated from southern India in that period. "The only way is to tear it all down and provide modern residences."

Resident Opposition

Yet certain residents, such as the leather artisan, are resisting the project.

Everyone acknowledges that this community, consistently overlooked as an illegal encroachment, is in stark need financial support and improvement. However they fear that this initiative – without community input – could potentially convert a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into a luxury development, displacing the disadvantaged, migrant communities who have lived there since the late 1800s.

It was these shunned, relocated individuals who built up the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of community resilience and commercial output, whose economic value is worth between a significant amount and a substantial sum annually, making it one of the world's largest informal economies.

Relocation Worries

Among approximately one million residents living in the packed 2.2 square kilometer neighborhood, less than 50% will be eligible for alternative accommodation in the development, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. Additional residents will be moved to wastelands and coastal regions on the distant periphery of the metropolis, risking fragment a long-established neighborhood. Certain individuals will receive no homes at all.

Residents permitted to remain in Dharavi will be given apartments in high-rise buildings, a substantial change from the evolved, shared lifestyle of residing and operating that has supported this area for generations.

Commercial activities from clothing production to ceramic crafts and recycling are expected to reduce in scale and be transferred to a specific "business area" separated from residential areas.

Survival Challenge

In the case of Shaikh, a craftsman and multi-generational inhabitant to call home Dharavi, the redevelopment presents a fundamental risk. His informal, multi-level workshop produces apparel – formal jackets, suede trenches, fashionable garments – marketed in luxury boutiques in upscale neighborhoods and internationally.

His family lives in the accommodations underneath and employees and garment workers – migrants from different regions – live in the same building, permitting him to afford their labour. Away from the slum, Mumbai rents are often 10 times more expensive for minimal space.

Threats and Warning

Within the government offices nearby, a visual representation of the transformation initiative shows a very different outlook. Slickly dressed residents mill about on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, purchasing continental baked goods and breakfast items and enlisting beverages on a terrace adjacent to a restaurant and Ice-Cream. This depicts a complete departure from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that maintains the neighborhood.

"This is not development for residents," states the artisan. "It represents an enormous real estate deal that will make it unaffordable for us to survive."

There is also concern of the development company. Run by an influential industrialist – a leading figure and a close ally of the national leader – the business group has faced accusations of favoritism and ethical concerns, which it disputes.

Although administrative bodies calls it a collaborative effort, the business group paid nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A case alleging that the project was questionably assigned to the business group is pending in the top court.

Continued Intimidation

After they started to publicly resist the redevelopment, protesters and community members state they have been subjected to ongoing efforts of harassment and intimidation – comprising phone calls, explicit warnings and suggestions that opposing the project was tantamount to opposing national interests – by individuals they claim work for the corporate group.

Included in these suspected of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c